Which relationship enables the invoice payer to be recorded as the payer on the payment transaction?

Which relationship enables the invoice payer to be recorded as the payer on the payment transaction?

• A. Subpayer
• B. Co-payer
• C. Primary payer
• D. Secondary payer

Answer: (A)

In Epic, who appears as the payer on a payment transaction is defined by the payer relationship within the payer hierarchy. A subpayer is a payer that acts under another payer, handling payments within that hierarchy. When the invoice payer is set up as a subpayer, the payment transaction can be recorded under the invoice payer rather than the primary payer, reflecting that the invoice issuer is the entity responsible for the payment in this workflow. This is the arrangement that lets the invoice payer show up as the payer on the remittance. If you label the payer as the primary payer, the main responsible payer would appear on the payment instead. A secondary payer would designate the other payer in the sequence, not the invoice issuer. A co-payer implies shared responsibility and still wouldn’t automatically route the payment to show the invoice payer.

In Epic, who appears as the payer on a payment transaction is defined by the payer relationship within the payer hierarchy. A subpayer is a payer that acts under another payer, handling payments within that hierarchy. When the invoice payer is set up as a subpayer, the payment transaction can be recorded under the invoice payer rather than the primary payer, reflecting that the invoice issuer is the entity responsible for the payment in this workflow. This is the arrangement that lets the invoice payer show up as the payer on the remittance.

If you label the payer as the primary payer, the main responsible payer would appear on the payment instead. A secondary payer would designate the other payer in the sequence, not the invoice issuer. A co-payer implies shared responsibility and still wouldn’t automatically route the payment to show the invoice payer.